Work exclusion clauses

September 17th, 2011

One of the things we’re all supposed to do is read the policy before we part with our money. That way, we see the limits of what we’re buying. So, for example, if you live in a flood plain and there’s an exclusion for water damage to your vehicle, you can make the right decision. In most of the cases, it’s going to be clear where the problems are. With this understanding, you either accept and work round the problem, or you look for an alternate policy. More generally, you might run into ambiguous terms. If you do find one, here’s a note of reassurance. Courts tend to favor you as the consumer. So, if there are several ways of reading a policy, the judge will pick the one most favorable to you.

One of the more common terms where this applies is the work exclusion clause. Let’s take the obvious extremes. If you run your own business and need to drive a vehicle, you should buy a commercial policy. If you work in an office and only use your vehicle to drive to and from work, a personal policy works fine. But there’s a big grey area in the middle where your employer might ask you to drive your own vehicle. The general rule would be that, if this only happens once in a blue moon, the personal policy will be sufficient. But if this is a regular part of your job, a commercial policy will be needed. In the best cases, your employer will provide a vehicle and insure it for you. But life’s not always so convenient. In a recent case decided in Minnesota, a man was working as an independent contractor, picking up work wherever he could. At the time of the accident, he was paid to deliver library books and used his own car. There was a work exclusion term in his policy.

This is quite a common practice. During the recession and continuing today, people take whatever work they can find. Because the rates of pay are low, it’s uneconomic to buy a commercial policy, so people take the risk on their personal policies. Although they know they will be driving more miles and the risk of an accident increases, they believe “occasional” use for business purposes will be covered. Insurers want to price the risks separately, and try to hold a clear line between personal and the more expensive commercial policies. The Supreme Court decided the exclusion term did not apply to this insured. Read the rest of this entry »

Saving money

September 16th, 2011

The majority of politicians have a split personality. One minute, the deficit is the end of the world as we know it. The next, there’s no reason to panic. Except, when you look round the neighborhood and see the number of homes going through foreclosure, all those people you know who are unemployed and businesses closing down, you realize the country has not yet recovered from the recession. With every dollar counting to put food on the table and keep a roof over your head, the challenge is to keep all the essentials in place within breaking the budget. In this, remember you always get what you pay for, so buying something cheap is often not giving you good value for your money. It’s always better to find goods or services of reasonable quality at a price you can afford.

So, from the earliest years, we’re taught to shop around. Family and friends laugh at us if we accept the first price offered in the first shop we walk into. Everyone knows you have to go into at least three shops to get an idea of how much goods of this type actually cost. Only then can we see what represents good value for money. Would you start walking round car lots and showrooms without having an idea of the current prices? Would you simply agree to pay the asking price? Almost everyone is prepared to ask for a discount. Haggling may not be everyone’s strength but, in these tough economic times, we should all make the effort. It’s the same with insurance to go with the vehicle. Read the rest of this entry »